30 Writing Topics: Analogy

Ideas for a Paragraph, Essay, or Speech Developed With Analogies

JGI / Getty Images

  • An Introduction to Punctuation
  • Ph.D., Rhetoric and English, University of Georgia
  • M.A., Modern English and American Literature, University of Leicester
  • B.A., English, State University of New York

An analogy is a kind of comparison that explains the unknown in terms of the known, the unfamiliar in terms of the familiar.

A good analogy can help your readers understand a complicated subject or view a common experience in a new way. Analogies can be used with other methods of development to explain a process , define a concept, narrate an event, or describe a person or place.

Analogy isn't a single form of writing. Rather, it's a tool for thinking about a subject, as these brief examples demonstrate:

  • "Do you ever feel that getting up in the morning is like pulling yourself out of quicksand? . . ." (Jean Betschart, In Control , 2001)
  • "Sailing a ship through a storm is . . . a good analogy for the conditions inside an organization during turbulent times, since not only will there be the external turbulence to deal with, but internal turbulence as well . . ." (Peter Lorange, Leading in Turbulent Times , 2010)
  • "For some people, reading a good book is like a Calgon bubble bath — it takes you away. . . ." (Kris Carr, Crazy Sexy Cancer Survivor , 2008)
  • "Ants are so much like human beings as to be an embarrassment. They farm fungi, raise aphids as livestock, launch armies into wars, use chemical sprays to alarm and confuse enemies, capture slaves. . . ." (Lewis Thomas, "On Societies as Organisms," 1971)
  • "To me, patching up a heart that'd had an attack was like changing out bald tires. They were worn and tired, just like an attack made the heart, but you couldn't just switch out one heart for another. . . ." (C. E. Murphy, Coyote Dreams , 2007)
  • "Falling in love is like waking up with a cold — or more fittingly, like waking up with a fever. . . ." (William B. Irvine, On Desire , 2006)

British author Dorothy Sayers observed that analogous thinking is a key aspect of the writing process . A composition professor explains:

Analogy illustrates easily and to almost everyone how an "event" can become an "experience" through the adoption of what Miss [Dorothy] Sayers called an "as if" attitude. That is, by arbitrarily looking at an event in several different ways, "as if" if it were this sort of thing, a student can actually experience transformation from the inside. . . . The analogy functions both as a focus and a catalyst for "conversion" of event into experience. It also provides, in some instances not merely the To discover original analogies that can be explored in a paragraph , essay, or speech, apply the "as if" attitude to any one of the 30 topics listed below. In each case, ask yourself, "What is it like ?"

Thirty Topic Suggestions: Analogy

  • Working at a fast-food restaurant
  • Moving to a new neighborhood
  • Starting a new job
  • Quitting a job
  • Watching an exciting movie
  • Reading a good book
  • Going into debt
  • Getting out of debt
  • Losing a close friend
  • Leaving home for the first time
  • Taking a difficult exam
  • Making a speech
  • Learning a new skill
  • Gaining a new friend
  • Responding to bad news
  • Responding to good news
  • Attending a new place of worship
  • Dealing with success
  • Dealing with failure
  • Being in a car accident
  • Falling in love
  • Getting married
  • Falling out of love
  • Experiencing grief
  • Experiencing joy
  • Overcoming an addiction to drugs
  • Watching a friend destroy himself (or herself)
  • Getting up in the morning
  • Resisting peer pressure
  • Discovering a major in college
  • The Value of Analogies in Writing and Speech
  • Understanding Analogy
  • 30 Writing Topics: Persuasion
  • Learn How to Use Extended Definitions in Essays and Speeches
  • Development in Composition: Building an Essay
  • 501 Topic Suggestions for Writing Essays and Speeches
  • Topic In Composition and Speech
  • List of Topics for How-to Essays
  • Definition and Examples of Transitional Paragraphs
  • How to Structure an Essay
  • How to Write a Narrative Essay or Speech
  • The Ultimate Guide to the 5-Paragraph Essay
  • Conclusion in Compositions
  • How to Write a Great Essay for the TOEFL or TOEIC
  • Understanding Organization in Composition and Speech
  • Personal Essay Topics

By clicking “Accept All Cookies”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts.


How To Write An Analogy Essay

  • Views 34731
  • Author Sandra W.

analogy argumentative essay topics

What Is An Analogy Essay?

An analogy compares two unlike things to illustrate common elements of both. An analogy essay is an extended analogy, which explains one thing in considerable depth by comparing it to another. Analogy essays discuss nearly anything, as long as the writer can find a comparison that fits.

Click Here To Download Analogy Essay Samples

How to use analogies:

  • As introductions for papers where you want to show how two ideas are parallel.
  • To explain unknown/abstract concepts in terms familiar to or easily understood by your reader. For example when explaining the storage pattern for a Macintosh computer, you might liken the hard drive icon to a large filing cabinet.

Steps For Writing An Analogy Essay

1. Come up with an analogy

 One-half of the analogy is the subject of explanation, while the other half is the explainer. For example, if you said growing up is like learning to ride a bike, you would be explaining something complex and subtle (growing up) in terms of something simple that your audience will be familiar with (riding a bike.)

2. Draw a vertical line down the middle of a piece of paper to divide it in half .

 On one half, write characteristics of the explainer, and on the other half, the explained. Try to match up the characteristics. For example, training wheels might be similar to having to have lots of supervision when you are young.

3. Write a paragraph discussing the explainer .

 Start with a statement like "Growing up is like learning to ride a bike." Then explain the stages of learning to ride a bike.

4. Write a paragraph discussing the explained .

Start with a statement that gives an overview of what the two shares. In the example above, you might say something like "Growing up also involves getting greater and greater freedoms as you become more confident”. Then explain the steps of the explained in a way that parallels the explainer.

5. Discuss the differences .

Sometimes there is a very important aspect of the explained that does not match up with the explainer. For example, in the above essay, you eventually completely learn to ride a bike, but you never stop growing up and learning new things. You may want to draw attention to this important distinction.

6. Review your choice of words for denotation and connotation .

The allure of analogies is such that they can lend themselves to exaggeration. Fight this tendency, as it will only jeopardize your credibility.

Recent Posts

  • A Sample Essay on Birds 21-08-2023 0 Comments
  • Is Homeschooling an Ideal Way... 21-08-2023 0 Comments
  • Essay Sample on Man 14-08-2023 0 Comments
  • Academic Writing(23)
  • Admission Essay(172)
  • Book Summaries(165)
  • College Tips(312)
  • Content Writing Services(1)
  • Essay Help(517)
  • Essay Writing Help(76)
  • Essays Blog(0)
  • Example(337)
  • Infographics(2)
  • Letter Writing(1)
  • Outlines(137)
  • Photo Essay Assignment(4)
  • Resume Writing Tips(62)
  • Samples Essays(315)
  • Writing Jobs(2)
  • Advertising
  • Applications
  • Assessments
  • Certificates
  • Announcement
  • Invitations
  • Newsletters
  • Questionnaires
  • Food & Beverages
  • Recruitment
  • Marketing Examples
  • Transportation

25 Analogy Examples

Analogy examples, 25 examples of analogies, 11. reasoning analogy, 12. analogy as the core of cognition, 13. analogy by similarity example, 14. semantic analogy example, 15. teaching by analogy example, 16. animal analogies example, 17. the principle of analogy, 18. analogy as exploration, 19. science analogy example, 20. practice analogy questions, 21. the reaction against analogy, 22. transformational analogy example, 23. curve analogies template, 24. analogy and transfer, 25. analogy in thinking example, what is an analogy, how to write an analogy, what is the difference with analogy, simile and metaphor, what are the elements of an analogy, what is the difference between analogy and idioms, 1. life is like a race.

life is like a race

2. Finding a Good Man is Like Finding a Needle in a Haystack

needle in a haystack

3. Just as a Sword is the Weapon of a Warrior, a Pen is the Weapon of a Writer

pen is the weapon of a writer

4. That’s as Useful as Rearranging Deck Chairs on the Titanic.

deck chairs on the titanic

5. How a Doctor Diagnoses Diseases are Like How a Detective Investigates Crimes

detective investigates crimes

6. Explaining a Joke is Like Dissecting a Frog

joke is like dissecting a frog

7. Just as a Caterpillar Comes out of its Cocoon, So we Must Come out of our Comfort Zone

caterpillar comes out of its cocoon

8. A Movie is a Roller Coaster Ride of Emotions.

ride of emotions

9. You are as Annoying as Nails on a Chalkboard.

nails on a chalkboard

10. Life is Like a Box of Chocolates – You Never Know What You’re Gonna Get!

box of chocolates

Step 1: Identify the Two or More Things You Want to Compare

Step 2: do your research on the similarities, step 3: make the analogies, step 4: give the explanation of the chosen analogies, more design, introduction of yourself in an email, 42+ thank-you note examples & samples, format of an email message, 25+ email examples & samples in pdf, best email etiquette tips for job seekers, how to create and send formal email messages, basic tips for job hunters when sending email, 8+ interofce memorandum examples, samples, 7+ witness statement examples & samples.


Related Articles

  • id; ?>)" rel="noopener" role="button" tabindex aria-label="postclick">17+ Schedule Examples in Excel
  • id; ?>)" rel="noopener" role="button" tabindex aria-label="postclick">5-Step Basic Guide on Essay Writing

We use cookies to enhance our website for you. Proceed if you agree to this policy or learn more about it.

  • Essay Database >
  • Essays Examples >
  • Essay Topics

Essays on Analogy

160 samples on this topic

The array of written assignments you might receive while studying Analogy is stunning. If some are too challenging, an expertly crafted sample Analogy piece on a related topic might lead you out of a deadlock. This is when you will definitely acknowledge WowEssays.com ever-widening directory of Analogy essay samples meant to catalyze your writing enthusiasm.

Our directory of free college paper samples showcases the most vivid instances of excellent writing on Analogy and related topics. Not only can they help you develop an interesting and fresh topic, but also display the effective use of the best Analogy writing practices and content organization techniques. Also, keep in mind that you can use them as a source of authoritative sources and factual or statistical data processed by real masters of their craft with solid academic experience in the Analogy area.

Alternatively, you can take advantage of efficient write my essay assistance, when our writers deliver a unique model essay on Analogy tailored to your individual specifications!

Tom Regan's “The Case For Animal Rights” Essay

Good essay on san mao comic strip, the form of the good in plato’s republic essay sample.

Get а 100% plagiarism free Essay on Analogy just from $10/page!

Become your best self with our academic help.

The Doctrine Of Doing And Allowing Essay


Friedman’s Position On Social Responsibility {type) To Use As A Writing Model

Outliers: chapter summaries and reflections book review examples, pros and cons of negotiation as a method of conflict resolution: free sample essay to follow, example of essay on team presentation evaluation journal entry.

Presentation Evaluation

Our team gave a group presentation regarding the comparison of Amazon and Alibaba. After considering my performance as it relates to the grading criteria, I would say that my strongest area was my design or my message, and my weakest area was my presentation style. This is because my research was complete, and my message was clear, but our delivery had certain flaws which could be addressed. I think, in terms of the team as a whole, I would say our presentation style was strongest, or our message, but our design was weakest.

Presentation Message generally complete, but citation was lacking

Moses And Monotheism Part III Literature Review Example

Mass incarceration: the new jim crow analogy essay samples, argumentative strategies and internet reliability essay samples, good hymn for the weekend by beyonce argumentative essay example, perfect model essay on analytical perspective/ elizabeth cady stanton’s, “keynote address at the first women’s rights convention”.

Brief Summary

Perfect Model Essay On Changing Behavior In Relation To Mode Of Transportation Choice In Kuwait

Research Method Assignment B

Chimamanda Adichie, Half Of A Yellow Sun Essay Example

Sample essay on rene descartes: meditations on first philosophy, workplace bullying by tracy, lutgen-sandvik & alberts, j. k essays examples, good example of essay on secrets are lies, privacy is theft: the circle and transparency, free should intelligent design be included in public school science classes argumentative essay example, learn to craft research papers on hiv prevention and focus on behavioral approaches with this example, nancy reagan: free sample critical thinking to follow, the cyborg manifesto: article review you might want to emulate, the hard problem of consciousness: between science and philosophy essay example.


The Culture Of Shut Up Essays Example

Learner's Full Name

Free Rachels And Callahan On Euthanasia Essay Example

Expertly written essay on ecological struggle in the american society to follow.

Ecological Struggle in the American Society

Free Critical Thinking On Assessing Socrates And “Government”

Good example of essay on gerard hopkins and romanticism, free essay about study guide.

Current Status and Future Directions of School Based Interventions

Example Of Fully Functioning Human Beings Vs Winesburg Ohio Essay

Does the materialist position imply a determinist position on the possibility of free will explain. essay.

Philosophy Questions

Compare and contrast the views of John Searle and Rene Descartes on dualism.

Good Essay About Argument Analysis: A College Education

Factors affecting second language learning research papers examples, example of fallacy example essay.

Fallacies in Communication

English versus Me Essays Examples

Mental health issues in correction system article sample.

The prison system that currently exists today offers a retribution measure instead of corrective actions to assert and ensure that the convicted assailants, after serving their prison time, could go back to the community as responsible individuals. While this is the case, a documentary featured in 2005 and 2009 documents a different role of prisons. Aside from housing convicted individuals, it also serves as a modern day asylum for mentally-ill individuals convicted of committing a crime against society.

International and Global Operations in Heineken Inc Dissertation Sample

What is the impact of effective formulation and implementation of strategies for venturing in international and global operations in Heineken Inc?

The Morality of Abortion Essay Samples

A. Thomson presents the case of the sick violinist in his defense of abortion. The proposition identifies that an individual wakes up in the morning and is next to an unconscious violinist (Thomson 114). Assuming that a plugged connection that saves their life is the only way that the violinist will live, the question arises whether there is a moral obligation to the individual to sustain lie for the violinist despite the personal atrophy that is simultaneously caused (Thomson 114).

Remarks on Mediation and Production by Soren Andreasen and Lars Bang Larsen Critical Thinkings Example

In the article entitled, “Remarks on Mediation and Production,” the authors Soren Andreasen and Lars Bang Larsen make their remark on the currently perceived role and suggested future role of middlemen. Note that these two authors are seasoned artists, writers, critics, and curators. Being middlemen, themselves, the two authors aim to defend the idea that middlemen play a more significant role in shaping the style of production – that middlemen help bring modernity and creativity in the style of production.

Example Of Course Work On Gender Roles In The Taming Of The Shrew

Nannie jeter course work example.

- What was the first name of the documentarian’s African-American caregiver?

- Since 1971 how much was the War on Drugs reported to cost? You will see this answer written so you don’t have to listen for it.

Over $1 Trillion Dollars

Example Of Macroeconomics Course Work

DQ 1. The Circular Flow in Economics

The Story of the Atlantic Slave Trade Book Review Sample

Thomas is married to Vanessa Jebb who comes from a diplomatic family. Jebb’s father was the first acting Secretary General of the United Nations. Thomas Hugh was a professor of History at University of Readings from 1966-1975. In 1979-1991, Thomas High was the Director of the Center for Policy Studies in London. Thomas Hugh was an ally of Margaret Thatcher during Thatcher’s reign. In his argument, Thomas Hugh presents an argument that is usually pro-European and conservative.

Course Work On Empiricism As The Foundation For Knowledge

Philosophy questions

- With reference to Locke's theory regarding ideas as well to the idea of primary and secondary qualities, breakdown and explain in Locke’s own terms what exactly you are perceiving when you perceive an object that you would identify as “a yellow banana”. In other words, what exactly are the primary qualities of this object, and what are its secondary qualities?

The Location Of The Solar System In Our Galaxy Course Work Sample

Short summary of shari'a’s evolution research papers examples.

Islam’s Shari'a Law

Unintentional Power In The Design Of Computer Systems Course Work Examples

Free an affirmative statement about birthday gifts thesis sample, cognitive psychology essay, the mind of the maker course work examples, essay on critical analysis report form for opposing opinion articles.

1. Author and major thesis of the Yes side. The authors of the Yes side are Marion Nestle and Michael F. Jacobson. They argue that a public health approach is needed to encourage Americans to eat a healthy diet.

Good Critical Thinking About Analogical Reasoning And Concept Formation

Essay on a critical thinking handbook, wendell berry’s- the art of a common place thesis statements examples, good example of argumentative essay on american legal system, argumentative essay on all animals are equal.

Evaluate an Argument and Create a Counter Argument

Good Essay About Annotation

Summary and Annotation

Essay On A Comparison Between Apples And Oranges Is Occurs When We Compare Two Items, Which

Statistical inference

Good Essay About Harlem Renaissance

Fifth agreement essays examples.

275 words = 1 page double-spaced

submit your paper

Password recovery email has been sent to [email protected]

Use your new password to log in

You are not register!

By clicking Register, you agree to our Terms of Service and that you have read our Privacy Policy .

Now you can download documents directly to your device!

Check your email! An email with your password has already been sent to you! Now you can download documents directly to your device.

or Use the QR code to Save this Paper to Your Phone

The sample is NOT original!

Short on a deadline?

Don't waste time. Get help with 11% off using code - GETWOWED

No, thanks! I'm fine with missing my deadline

analogy argumentative essay topics

Metaphors and Analogies: How to Use Them in Your Academic Life

analogy argumentative essay topics

Certain Experiences in life can't be captured in simple words. Especially if you are a writer trying to connect with your audience, you will need special threads to evoke exact feelings.

There are many literary devices to spark the readers' imagination, and analogies and metaphors are one of that magical arsenal. They enrich your text and give it the exact depth it will need to increase your readers' heartbeat.

Taking a particular characteristic and associating it with the other not only enriches your text's linguistic quality but gives the reader a correct pathway to deeper layers of a writer's psyche.

In this article, we are going to take a good look at the difference between analogy and metaphor and how to use them in your academic writing, and you will find some of the most powerful examples for each. Learn more about this and other vital linguistic tools on our essay writer service website.

What are Metaphors: Understanding the Concept

Let's discuss the metaphors definition. Metaphors are a figure of speech that compares two unrelated concepts or ideas to create a deeper and more profound meaning. They are a powerful tool in academic writing to express abstract concepts using different analogies, which can improve the reader's understanding of complex topics. Metaphors enable writers to paint vivid pictures in the reader's mind by comparing something familiar with an abstract concept that is harder to grasp.

The following are some of the most famous metaphors and their meanings:

  • The world is your oyster - the world is full of opportunities just waiting for you to grab them
  • Time is money - time is a valuable commodity that must be spent wisely
  • A heart of stone - someone who is emotionally cold and unfeeling

Analogies Meaning: Mastering the Essence

Analogies, on the other hand, are a comparison of two concepts or ideas that have some similarity in their features. They are used to clarify complex ideas or to make a new concept more relatable by comparing it to something that is already familiar.

Analogies are often followed by an explanation of how the two concepts are similar, which helps the reader to understand and make connections between seemingly disparate ideas. For example, in academic writing, if you were explaining the function of a cell membrane, you might use an analogy, such as comparing it to a security gate that regulates what enters and exits a building.

Check out these famous analogies examples:

  • Knowledge is like a garden: if it is not cultivated, it cannot be harvested.
  • Teaching a child without education is like building a house without a foundation.
  • A good friend is like a four-leaf clover; hard to find and lucky to have.

Benefits of Metaphors and Analogies in Writing

Chances are you are wondering why we use analogies and metaphors in academic writing anyway?


The reason why metaphors are beneficial to writers, especially in the academic field, is that they offer an effective approach to clarifying intricate concepts and enriching comprehension by linking them to more familiar ideas. Through the use of relatable frames of reference, these figures of speech help authors communicate complicated notions in an appealing and comprehensible way.

Additionally, analogies and metaphors are a way of artistic expression. They bring creativity and imagination to your writing, making it engaging and memorable for your readers. Beautiful words connect with readers on a deeper emotional level, allowing them to better retain and appreciate the information being presented. Such linguistic devices allow readers to open doors for imagination and create visual images in their minds, creating a more individualized experience.

However, one must be mindful not to plagiarize famous analogies and always use original ideas or appropriately cite sources when necessary. Overall, metaphors and analogies add depth and beauty to write-ups, making them memorable for years to come.

Understanding the Difference Between Analogy and Metaphor

While metaphors and analogies serve the similar purpose of clarifying otherwise complex ideas, they are not quite the same. Follow the article and learn how they differ from each other.

One way to differentiate between analogies and metaphors is through the use of 'as' and 'like.' Analogies make an explicit comparison using these words, while metaphors imply a comparison without any overt indication.

There is an obvious difference between their structure. An analogy has two parts; the primary subject, which is unfamiliar, and a secondary subject which is familiar to the reader. For example, 'Life is like a box of chocolates.' The two subjects are compared, highlighting their similarities in order to explain an entire concept.

On the other hand, a metaphor describes an object or idea by referring to something else that is not literally applicable but shares some common features. For example, 'He drowned in a sea of grief.'

The structural difference also defines the difference in their usage. Analogies are often used in academic writing where hard concepts need to be aligned with an easier and more familiar concept. This assists the reader in comprehending complex ideas more effortlessly. Metaphors, on the other hand, are more often used in creative writing or literature. They bring depth and nuance to language, allowing for abstract ideas to be communicated in a more engaging and imaginative way.

Keep reading and discover examples of metaphors and analogies in both academic and creative writing. While you are at it, our expert writers are ready to provide custom essays and papers which incorporate these literary devices in a seamless and effective way.

Using Famous Analogies Can Raise Plagiarism Concerns!

To avoid the trouble, use our online plagiarism checker and be sure that your work is original before submitting it.

Analogies and Metaphors Examples

There were a few analogies and metaphors examples mentioned along the way, but let's explore a few more to truly understand their power. Below you will find the list of metaphors and analogies, and you will never mistake one for the other again.

  • Love is like a rose, beautiful but with thorns.
  • The human body is like a machine, with many intricate parts working together in harmony.
  • The structure of an atom is similar to a miniature solar system, with electrons orbiting around the nucleus.
  • A computer's motherboard is like a city's central system, coordinating and communicating all functions.
  • The brain is like a muscle that needs constant exercise to function at its best.
  • Studying for exams is like training for a marathon; it requires endurance and preparation.
  • Explaining a complex scientific concept is like explaining a foreign language to someone who doesn't speak it.
  • A successful team is like a well-oiled machine, with each member playing a crucial role.
  • Learning a new skill is like planting a seed; it requires nurturing and patience to see growth.
  • Navigating through life is like sailing a ship with unpredictable currents and changing winds.
  • Life is a journey with many twists and turns along the way
  • The world's a stage, and we are all mere players.
  • Her eyes were pools of sorrow, reflecting the pain she felt.
  • Time is a thief, stealing away moments we can never recapture.
  • Love is a flame, burning brightly but at risk of being extinguished.
  • His words were daggers piercing through my heart.
  • She had a heart of stone, unable to feel empathy or compassion.
  • The city was a jungle, teeming with life and activity.
  • Hope is a beacon, guiding us through the darkest of times.
  • His anger was a volcano, ready to erupt at any moment.

How to Use Metaphors and Analogies in Writing: Helpful Tips

If you want your readers to have a memorable and engaging experience, you should give them some level of autonomy within your own text. Metaphors and analogies are powerful tools to let your audience do their personal interpretation and logical conclusion while still guiding them in the right direction.


First, learn about your audience and their level of familiarity with the topic you're writing about. Incorporate metaphors and analogies with familiar references. Remember, literary devices should cleverly explain complex concepts. To achieve the goal, remain coherent with the theme of the paper. But be careful not to overuse metaphors or analogies, as too much of a good thing can make your writing feel overloaded.

Use figurative language to evoke visual imagery and breathe life into your paper. Multiple metaphors can turn your paper into a movie. Visualizing ideas will help readers better understand and retain the information.

In conclusion, anytime is a great time to extend your text's impact by adding a well-chosen metaphor or analogy. But perfection is on the border of good and bad, so keep in mind to remain coherent with the theme and not overuse any literary device.

Metaphors: Unveiling Their Cultural Significance

Metaphors are not limited to just academic writing but can also be found in various forms of culture, such as art, music, film, and television. Metaphors have been a popular element in creative expression for centuries and continue to play a significant role in modern-day culture. For instance, metaphors can help artists convey complex emotions through their music or paintings.

Metaphors are often like time capsules, reflecting the cultural and societal values of a particular era. They shelter the prevailing beliefs, ideals, and philosophies of their time - from the pharaohs of ancient Egypt to modern-day pop culture.

Metaphors often frame our perception of the world and can shape our understanding of our surroundings. Certain words can take on new meanings when used metaphorically in certain cultural contexts and can assimilate to the phenomenon it is often compared to.

Here you can find a list of literature and poems with metaphors:

  • William Shakespeare loved using metaphors, and here's one from his infamous Macbeth: 'It is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.'
  • Victor Hugo offers a timeless metaphor in Les Misérables: 'She is a rose, delicate and beautiful, but with thorns to protect her.'
  • Robert Frost reminds us of his genius in the poem The Road Not Traveled: 'The road less traveled.'

Movies also contain a wide range of English metaphors:

  • A famous metaphor from Toy Story: 'There's a snake in my boot!'
  • A metaphor from the famous movie Silver Lining Playbook: 'Life is a game, and true love is a trophy.'
  • An all-encompassing and iconic metaphor from the movie Star Wars: 'Fear is the path to the dark side.'

Don't forget about famous songs with beautiful metaphors!

  • Bob Dylan's Blowin' in the Wind uses a powerful metaphor when he asks: 'How many roads must a man walk down?'
  • A metaphor from Johnny Cash's song Ring of Fire: 'Love is a burning thing, and it makes a fiery ring.'
  • Bonnie Tyler's famous lyrics from Total Eclipse of the Heart make a great metaphor: 'Love is a mystery, everyone must stand alone.'

Keep reading the article to find out how to write an essay with the effective use of metaphors in academic writing.

Exploring Types of Metaphors

There is a wide variety of metaphors used in academic writing, literature, music, and film. Different types of metaphors can be used to convey different meanings and create a specific impact or evoke a vivid image.

Some common types of metaphors include similes / simple metaphors, implicit metaphors, explicit metaphors, extended metaphors, mixed metaphors, and dead metaphors. Let's take a closer look at some of these types.

Simple metaphors or similes highlight the similarity between two things using 'like' or 'as.' For example, 'Her eyes were as bright as the stars.'

Implicit metaphors do not make a direct comparison. Instead, they imply the similarity between the two concepts. An example of an implicit metaphor is 'Her words cut deep,' where the similarity between words and a knife is implied. Good metaphors are often implicit since they require the reader to use their own understanding and imagination to understand the comparison being made.

Explicit metaphors are straightforward, making a clear comparison between two things. For instance, 'He is a shining star.'

An extended metaphor, on the other hand, stretches the comparison throughout an entire literary work or section of a text. This type of metaphor allows the writer to create a more complex and elaborate comparison, enhancing the reader's understanding of the subject.

Mixed metaphors combine two or more unrelated metaphors, often leading to confusion and lack of clarity. If you are not an expert on the subject, try to avoid using confusing literary devices.

Dead metaphors are another danger. These are metaphors that have been overused to the extent that they have lost their original impact, becoming clichés and not being able to evoke original visual images.

In academic writing, metaphors create a powerful impact on the reader, adding color and depth to everyday language. However, they need to be well-placed and intentional. Using an inappropriate or irrelevant metaphor may confuse readers and distract them from the main message. If you want to avoid trouble, pay for essay writing service that can help you use metaphors effectively in your academic writing.

Exploring Types of Analogies

Like metaphors, analogies are divided into several categories. Some of the common types include literal analogies, figurative analogies, descriptive analogies, causal analogies, and false/dubious analogies. In academic writing, analogies are useful for explaining complex ideas or phenomena in a way that is easy to understand.

Literal analogies are direct comparisons of two things with similar characteristics or features. For instance, 'The brain is like a computer.'

Figurative analogies, on the other hand, compare two unrelated things to highlight a particular characteristic. For example, 'The mind is a garden that needs to be tended.'

Descriptive analogies focus on the detailed similarities between two things, even if they are not immediately apparent. For example, 'The relationship between a supervisor and an employee is like that of a coach and a player, where the coach guides the player to perform at their best.'

Causal analogies are used to explain the relationship between a cause and an effect. For instance, 'The increase in global temperatures is like a fever caused by environmental pollution.'

Finally, false/dubious analogies are comparisons that suggest a similarity between two things that actually have little in common. For example, 'Getting a college degree is like winning the lottery.'

If you are trying to explain a foreign concept to an audience that may not be familiar with it, analogies can help create a bridge and make the concept more relatable. However, coming up with a perfect analogy takes a lot of time. If you are looking for ways on how to write an essay fast , explore our blog and learn even more.

Do Metaphors and Analogies Differ?

Simply put, metaphors and analogies are not the same thing. While they are both linguistic devices to clarify hard concepts, show similarities between two seemingly different things, and make writing more engaging by using vivid imagery, they differ in the way they compare two things.

Metaphors suggest a comparison between two things. For example, 'Her voice is honey.' However, analogies use comparison to explain or clarify a complex idea or phenomenon. For example, 'The human brain is like a supercomputer with infinite storage capacity.'

You can get away from the trouble of choosing between metaphors and analogies if you just say, ' Do my essay for me ' and use the help of our professional writing service.

How to Pick the Top Metaphors or Analogies for My Coursework?

When choosing the best metaphor or analogy for your coursework, start by considering the concept first. What specific aspect of the concept do you want to highlight or clarify? Next, consider the audience. What kind of examples would they best relate to? Identify the purpose of a specific literary device. Do you want to explain a similarity between two ideas or create a vivid mental image in their mind? Lastly, find a balance between creativity and clarity. Using too complex or far-off analogies or metaphors may confuse the reader, while overly simplified ones can make your work look unprofessional.

If you want your academic papers to stand out and be engaging for the reader, using metaphors and analogies can be a powerful tool. Now that you know the difference between analogy and metaphor, you can use them wisely to create a bridge between complex ideas and your audience.

Explore our blog for more information on different writing techniques, and check out our essay writing service for more help on crafting the perfect papers.

Need to Be on Top of Your Academic Game?

We'll elevate your academic writing to the next level with papers tailored to your specific requirements!

Related Articles

Types of Tone in Writing and How to Effectively Use Them

Logo for M Libraries Publishing

Want to create or adapt books like this? Learn more about how Pressbooks supports open publishing practices.

Part Six: Evaluating Inductive Logic

Chapter Fifteen: Arguments from Analogy

Arguments that make their point by means of similarities are impostors, and, unless you are on your guard against them, will quite readily deceive you. —Plato
Analogies decide nothing, that is true, but they can make one feel more at home. —Sigmund Freud, New Introductory Lectures on Psychoanalysis

Correct Form for Arguments from Analogy

  • The Total Evidence Condition (1): Relevant Similarities
  • The Total Evidence Condition (2): Irrelevant Dissimilarities
  • The Special Character of Arguments from Analogy

Arguments from analogy declare that because two items are the same in one respect they are the same in another. As Freud notes, they can make you feel at home—and for that reason they can be especially persuasive.

During World War I, the Socialist Party distributed leaflets to recent draftees, urging them to oppose the draft. The draft, they contended, violated the constitutional amendment against involuntary servitude. Oliver Wendell Holmes, chief justice of the Supreme Court, argued that they did not have the right to circulate the leaflets during wartime. The right to free speech, he asserted, “would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theater and causing a panic.” Since in both cases “the words used . . . create a clear and present danger,” he concluded, the right to free speech did not protect the Socialists in expressing ideas that might harm the war effort. The argument begins with something familiar—of course we don’t have the right to falsely shout fire in a theater—and invites us to conclude the same about something less familiar—under certain circumstances we don’t even have the right to explain to others our interpretation of the U.S. Constitution. (Holmes is often quoted as calling it “a crowded theater.” He didn’t, though it is probably what he had in mind.)

Arguments from analogy are almost always enticing because, by their very nature, they use two of the quick-and-dirty shortcuts in reasoning described in Chapter 1. By beginning with the familiar, they exploit our dependence on the vividness shortcut; and by presenting similarities between the familiar and the unfamiliar, they take advantage of our dependence on the similarity shortcut. They are custom-made for the way our minds naturally operate. This makes us especially susceptible to them and heightens the importance of being able to evaluate them effectively.

15.1 Correct Form for Arguments from Analogy

Analogies are often used merely for rhetorical effect. Acel Moore of the Philadelphia Inquirer, for example, writes: “Writing editorials is a lot like wearing a navy blue suit and standing in a rainstorm on a cold day and wetting your pants; it may give you a warm feeling for a minute, but no one else is going to notice.” Moore doesn’t attempt to establish any conclusion based on the similarity—he simply makes note of it. Don’t jump to the conclusion that an analogy introduces an argument unless there really is—at least implicitly—a conclusion.

When there is an argument from analogy , as in the preceding free speech argument, it can typically be clarified according to the following form:

  • A is F and G.

A and B, as always, are used here as name letters. They name the two analogs [1] —that is, the two things (or classes of things) that are said to be analogous. A, the basic analog , is the one that we are presumed to be more familiar with; in the free speech argument it is falsely shouting fire in a theater. B, the inferred analog , is the thing in question, the one that the argument draws a conclusion about; in the free speech argument it is expressing ideas that might harm the war effort.

We will continue to use F and G as property letters. F is the basic similarity , the property that the two analogs share, presumably without controversy. In the free speech argument, the basic similarity is that they create a clear and present danger. And G is the inferred similarity , the property that the inferred analog is purported to have on the grounds that the basic analog has it. Is not protected by the right to free speech is the inferred similarity in the free speech argument. Here is one good way to clarify the argument:

  • Falsely shouting fire in a theater creates a clear and present danger and is not protected by the right to free speech.
  • Expressing ideas that might harm the war effort creates a clear and present danger.
  • ∴ Expressing ideas that might harm the war effort is not protected by the right to free speech..

Variations on this model are common. The basic or inferred analog, for example, will sometimes include more than one item, as in this example:

Manatees must be mammals, since whales and dolphins, like manatees, are sea creatures that give live birth, and whales and dolphins are definitely mammals.

In this case, the basic analog—the content of A —is whales and dolphins.

Likewise, either the basic similarity or the inferred similarity may include more than one property, as in this example:

Manatees must be mammals, since whales, like manatees, are sea creatures that give live birth and that nourish their young on the mother’s milk, and whales are definitely mammals.

In this example, the basic similarity—the content of F —is sea creatures that give live birth and nourish their young on the mother’s milk.

Clarifying an argument from analogy is usually a straightforward matter. It is easiest to begin by identifying the analogs—the two items that the arguer is comparing; insert the one that is not in question into the A position as the basic analog, and the one that is in question into the B position, as the inferred analog. Then insert the basic similarity—the property the two analogs uncontroversially share—into both premises as F. Finally, insert the inferred similarity into the first premise and the conclusion, as G.

Arguments from analogy are sometimes enthymemes. When there is an implicit statement, it is usually the second premise, the one that establishes the basic similarity. This is because arguers often assume, rightly, that the similarity between two analogs is so obvious that it goes without saying. Suppose I say to a friend of mine, whose son is about to enter first grade, “Since John behaves respectfully towards his parents, he will surely treat his teachers with respect.” The basic analog is John’s parents, the inferred analog is John’s teachers, and the inferred similarity is are treated with respect by John. But what is the basic similarity? We must identify a relevant trait that parents and teachers have in common, namely, that they are authority figures to John. Here is the clarified argument. (Brackets, as usual, indicate that premise 2 is implicit, but we also must supply to premise 1 the part about authority figures.)

  • John’s parents are authority figures to him and are treated with respect by him.
  • [John’s teachers will be authority figures to him.]
  • ∴ John’s teachers will be treated with respect by him.

EXERCISES Chapter 15, set (a)

For each of these arguments from analogy, identify the basic analog, the inferred analog, the basic similarity, and the inferred similarity. Then clarify it in standard clarifying format.

Sample exercise. “Expressions of shock and sadness came from other coaches and administrators following the announcement by Tulane President Eamon Kelly that the school planned to drop its basketball program in the wake of the alleged gambling scheme and newly discovered NCAA violations. Coach Jim Killingsworth of TCU said: ‘I think they should deal with the problem, not do away with it. If they had something like that happen in the English department, would they do away with that? I feel like they should have tried to solve their problems.’” —Associated Press

Sample answer. Basic analog: English department. Inferred analog: basketball program. Basic similarity: is a college program (implicit). Inferred similarity: should not be eliminated if experiencing problems.

  • The English department is a college program and should not be eliminated if it is experiencing problems.
  • [The basketball program is a college program.]
  • ∴ The basketball program should not be eliminated if it is experiencing problems.
  • In a good marriage, partners often seek counseling to help them resolve their difficulties. You’re having trouble with your boss—why should a conflict in an employer–employee relationship be treated any differently?
  • So you got tickets to the Metropolitan Opera’s production of the “Flying Dutchman”? You should try to smuggle in a flashlight and a good book. I made the mistake of going to Wagner’s “Parsifal”—that night was one of the most boring years of my life.
  • Etiquette arbiter Emily Post contended that men need not remove their hats in elevators when there are women present. She reasoned that an elevator is a means of transportation, just like a streetcar, bus, subway, or train. The only difference is that an elevator travels vertically, rather than horizontally. A man is not expected to remove his hat in other vehicles, so there is no need for him to do so in an elevator.
  • View expressed in a mid-20th century article by a professional sociologist: One attribute with which women are naturally and uniquely gifted is the care of children. Since the ill and infirm resemble children in many ways, being not merely physically weak and helpless but also psychologically dependent, it is fairly easy to conclude that women are also especially qualified to care for the sick.
  • “Suppose you had a son, a fine writer who had brought national recognition for his college newspaper and a scholarship for himself. Suppose that, in his junior year, a big-city newspaper offered him a reporter’s job with a three-year guarantee at an unheard-of salary. Would you advise him to turn down the offer of a professional newspaper job? We know the answer. And we would not think twice before urging him, begging him, to hire on with the newspaper. After all, we’d say, the reason he was in college was to start to prepare himself for a decent career in the field of his choosing. So, why all the fulmination about a star athlete’s taking the chance to make himself a cool $5 million by doing for pay what he’s been doing for free (presumably) for three years?” —William Raspberry, Los Angeles Times
  • “We feel instinctive sympathy for the defendant who pleads, ‘I tried to get a job and nobody would hire me. Only in desperation did I turn to robbery.’ Now consider the logically parallel defense: ‘I tried to seduce a woman legitimately and nobody would sleep with me. Only in desperation did I turn to rape.’ Nobody would buy that from a rapist, and nobody should buy it from a robber.” —Steven Landsburg, Forbes

15.2 The Total Evidence Condition (1): Relevant Similarities

If an argument from analogy can be loyally paraphrased in the form described above, then it satisfies the correct form condition. But for an inductive argument to be logically strong it must not only satisfy the correct form condition; it must also satisfy the total evidence condition. As with frequency arguments and inductive generalizations, there are two parts to the total evidence condition for arguments from analogy: the basic similarity must be relevant, and any dissimilarities must be irrelevant. If an argument does poorly on either one of these conditions, it should be judged no better than logically weak.

Although analogical arguments are sometimes accused of committing the fallacy of false analogy (or the fallacy of faulty analogy ), this fallacy is very much like the fallacy of hasty generalization. The existence of the named fallacy highlights the ease with which we can make mistakes in this sort of reasoning. But to accuse an argument from analogy of committing this fallacy says nothing about what has gone wrong with the argument. It is far better to explain more specifically how it is that some necessary condition for soundness has not been satisfied.

Total Evidence Condition for Arguments from Analogy

  • The basic similarity must be relevant —it must count in favor of the inferred similarity.
  • The dissimilarities must be irrelevant —any dissimilarity between the two analogs must not make the basic analog a better candidate for the inferred property.

The argument is logically weaker to the extent that it fails in either area.

15.2.1 The Relevance of the Basic Similarity

Begin your deliberations about the total evidence question by asking, Is the basic similarity relevant? The more relevant it is, the stronger the logic of the argument might be. When you consider this question, forget about the two analogs and simply consider to what extent the basic similarity counts in favor of the inferred similarity. A television advertising campaign by a dairy company shows old but cheerful citizens of the Republic of Georgia eating yogurt; they have eaten yogurt all their lives, we are told, and they are now well past the century mark—one woman is now 134! Eating yogurt, we are encouraged to believe, could do the same for us. The first step in evaluating how well this argument satisfies the total evidence condition is to ignore the two analogs (citizens of Georgia and us) and ask whether the basic similarity—eating yogurt—counts in favor of the inferred similarity—a long life. There is no special reason to think so, and the argument doesn’t help by providing one. So the logic of the argument is very weak.

More commonly an argument from analogy satisfies the condition at least to some degree. One large state university published the following story in its alumni magazine:

A preliminary appraisal of the results of a major assessment of faculty and graduate programs conducted by the Conference Board of Associated Research Councils placed our institution second in the nation among public research universities and in the top five overall. “It is gratifying to see our faculty receive this national recognition of their superior research and teaching,” said the Chancellor. Even though the study focused on graduate programs, he pointed out that the results could also be applied to the undergraduate program as well, since the two programs share the same faculty.

The university’s graduate program is the basic analog and its undergraduate program the inferred analog. The basic similarity is that the university’s excellent faculty staffs them. And the inferred similarity is that the academic programs are excellent. Is the basic similarity relevant? That is, does having an excellent faculty count toward the excellent academic programs? Of course it does. So this argument easily clears the first hurdle of the total evidence condition. But it is too soon to conclude that the argument is logically strong; there is still a second total evidence hurdle to clear.

15.2.2 Relevant Similarities and the Fallacy of Equivocation

Suppose I say, “Einstein was smart, and he was able to revolutionize physics. The physics teacher I had in high school is smart, too, so he should be able to revolutionize physics.” The basic similarity is relevant to the inferred similarity—smart is better than stupid when it comes to revolutionizing physics. But there is smart, and then there is smart. Surely my high school physics teacher is not as smart as Einstein. Doesn’t that weaken the argument? Let’s clarify it and see:

  • Einstein was smart and was able to revolutionize physics.
  • My high school physics teacher is smart.
  • ∴ My high school physics teacher is able to revolutionize physics.

Smart shows up in both premises. To ask whether my high school physics teacher is as smart as Einstein is to ask, in effect, whether the word means the same thing in each case. It is a general expression. Recalling our coverage of generality in Chapter 5, this means that it is an expression that allows for degrees (examples were fine, bald, brown, living together, incompatible, wrong, and evil ). As we saw, generality is usually unproblematic. It becomes problematic, however, when the meaning of the expression shifts from one use to the next, and when the apparent success of the argument depends on that shift. In that case, the argument commits the fallacy of equivocation; the lesson from Chapter 5 is to eliminate the ambiguity.

Let’s eliminate the ambiguity by using the reasonable-premises approach in revising premise 2; in that case it is as follows:

2. My high school physics teacher is smart, though not as smart as Einstein.

While this is probably true, we now have a major problem with the logic of the argument—namely, it no longer satisfies the correct form condition, since the basic similarity, established in premise 1, is not asserted in premise 2. (The form is now something like this: 1. A is F and G; 2. B is sort of like F ; ∴ C . B is G. ) Let’s try revising it again, this time using the reasonable-logic approach. This gives us the following:

2. My high school physics teacher is just as smart as Einstein.

This nicely fixes the logical problem, but at the cost of what is pretty obviously a false premise. Either way, the argument is unsound.

The Oliver Wendell Holmes free speech argument, presented at the beginning of the chapter, provides a weightier example of the same problem. The basic similarity, creating a clear and present danger, certainly counts in favor of the inferred similarity of not being protected by the right to free speech. But is the danger caused by the wartime expression of potentially subversive ideas as clear and as present as the danger caused by the false shout of fire in a theater? If not, doesn’t this weaken the argument? Let’s take another look at Holmes’s clarified argument.

  • ∴ Expressing ideas that might harm the war effort is not protected by the right to free speech.

The phrase clear and present danger, like the term smart in the Einstein example, is a general term that seems to apply to a greater degree in premise 1 than in premise 2. It is plausible to suppose that this shift contributes to the apparent success of the argument, and thus that the argument commits the fallacy of equivocation. So we should revise our paraphrase of premise 2 to eliminate the ambiguity. On the one hand, we could paraphrase it to say that those who scattered the leaflets created a clear and present danger, though less clear and present than falsely shouting fire in a theater. The premise would probably be true, but we would have created the same logical difficulty described in the Einstein argument—the basic similarity is not the same in each premise. On the other hand, we could paraphrase it to say that they created a clear and present danger that is just as clear and present as falsely shouting fire in a theater. We have now satisfied the correct form condition but probably have a false premise.

The problem is one to look for whenever you are clarifying an argument from analogy.

EXERCISES Chapter 15, set (b)

For each of the arguments in set (a), answer whether the basic similarity is relevant.

Sample exercise. See sample in set (a).

Sample answer. The basic similarity (that something is a college program) has some relevance to the inferred similarity (that it shouldn’t be eliminated if it is experiencing problems), but only to a limited extent. It is relevant only insofar as there is some weak presumption in any sort of institution that a program that has been set up was set up for a good reason.

15.3 The Total Evidence Condition (2): Irrelevant Dissimilarities

15.3.1 the irrelevance of the dissimilarities.

The second total evidence question is Are there relevant dissimilarities? Preferably they are irrelevant, for the more relevant the dissimilarities, the weaker the logic of the argument. When you consider this question, forget about the basic similarity and concentrate on the two analogs. There are always innumerable ways in which they are dissimilar, but most or all of them will be irrelevant. What matters is to what extent any dissimilarity makes the basic analog a better candidate for the inferred property.

Consider, for example, the free speech argument. There are many dissimilarities. One of the activities happens in a theater, for example, while the other could happen anywhere; but this is irrelevant, since there is no reason to think that things said in a theater are less deserving of protection by the right to free speech than things said anywhere else. Or, for example, one of them is spoken aloud, while the other could be written down; but again, this is irrelevant, for there is no general reason to think that the spoken word is more worthy of free speech protection than the written word.

Some of the dissimilarities, however, are relevant. In the theater case, what is expressed is intentionally deceptive, while in the leaflet case, what is expressed seems to have been utterly sincere. This, taken by itself, certainly makes the theater case a better candidate for exemption from free speech protection, and thus it counts as a relevant dissimilarity. Furthermore, in the theater case, the action is sure to have a harmful result; but in the leaflet case, there is no assurance that anyone will pay any attention or, if they do, that they will be influenced (in fact, it was established that no one had been persuaded by the leaflet). This, too, makes the theater case a better candidate for lack of protection by the right to free speech.

In short, even if we forget that the phrase clear and present danger may be equivocal, the argument does not score well on the second portion of the total evidence condition. Its logic can be judged, at best, as fairly weak. Brilliant jurist that he was, I should note that Oliver Wendell Holmes relied, as he should have, on a good deal more than just this argument in support of his conclusion.

Let’s now return to the academic excellence argument. Here is the clarification:

  • The university’s graduate program is staffed by the university’s faculty and is academically excellent.
  • The university’s undergraduate program is staffed by the university’s faculty.
  • ∴ The university’s undergraduate program is academically excellent.

There are many dissimilarities between the graduate and undergraduate programs of any large state university. Graduate courses, for example, are usually assigned higher catalog numbers than are undergraduate courses. But this is irrelevant; catalog numbers are not like scores flashed by Olympic judges, with higher numbers going to better courses. Another difference is that in large state universities the graduate students tend to have much more exposure to the faculty than do the undergraduate students—their classes are much smaller and are more frequently taught by the regular faculty members. This is relevant, since student exposure to faculty can contribute powerfully to academic excellence. The conclusion may still be true. But even though this argument does well on the first condition, it performs badly on the second and so its logic must be considered weak.

EXERCISES Chapter 15, set (c)

For each of the arguments in set (a), do three things: ( i ) state an irrelevant dissimilarity, and explain, ( ii ) explain any relevant dissimilarities, and ( iii ) state your evaluation of the argument’s logic based on this and the previous exercise.

Sample answer. ( i ) The basketball program probably has a higher proportion of students on full scholarship than does the English department. This doesn’t seem relevant, since it doesn’t make English a better candidate for preservation in the face of difficulties. ( ii ) The most important dissimilarity is that the English department is not only an academic program, but also one that is central to the mission of the institution, while the basketball program is an athletic program and thus more peripheral to its mission. This means there is a far stronger impetus to work out English department difficulties before disbanding it. ( iii ) Though the argument is OK on the first part of the total evidence condition, it fails the second part and is logically very weak.

15.4 The Special Character of Arguments from Analogy

15.4.1 arguments from analogy as logical borrowers.

As you may have noticed, every example of an argument from analogy worked out in this chapter has been declared logically weak and thus unsound. This is not an aberration. Although not all arguments from analogy are unsound, they do establish their conclusions far less often than any other sort of argument. Plato, in the lead quotation for this chapter, calls them “impostors.” Analogical arguments, unlike any other arguments we look at in this book, have a built-in logical shortcoming.

Let’s take another look at the logical form of arguments from analogy:

  • A (basic analog) is F (basic similarity) and G (inferred similarity).
  • B (inferred analog) is F (basic similarity).
  • ∴ B (inferred analog) is G (inferred similarity).

What is the source of logical strength for such an argument? Not the correct form condition; as with every other inductive argument, satisfying this condition merely qualifies the argument for any strength that might be conferred by the total evidence condition. Not the second part of the total evidence condition; the absence of relevant dissimilarities simply means there is no evidence to undermine whatever strength it has. [2]  This leaves the first part of the total evidence condition as the sole positive source of logical strength.

How does the first part of the total evidence condition provide logical strength? By virtue of the fact that the basic similarity counts in favor of the inferred similarity. But what does count in favor of mean here? The only meaning I know is a sound argument can be offered for it. So we can now see that logically strong analogical arguments derive their logical strength from another argument—the argument that can be offered from the inferred similarity to the basic similarity. We will call such an argument (an argument from F to G —see premise 1 of the form clarified above) a background argument . Stated simply: an analogical argument’s only logical strength is borrowed from a background argument.

Any other sort of argument can, in principle, lend its strength to an argument from analogy. For example, in the preceding chapter we looked briefly at the argument Every Japanese car I’ve ever owned has been well built, so that Toyota is probably well built. It could easily be clarified as an argument from analogy, clarified as follows:

  • Every Japanese car I’ve ever owned has been a Japanese car and has been well built.
  • [That Toyota is a Japanese car.]
  • ∴ That Toyota is well built.

If the similarity is relevant in this case, it is because the background argument is a logically strong inductive generalization that goes from my experience of Japanese cars (the basic similarity) to the conclusion that Japanese cars in general are well built (the inferred similarity). The argument from analogy is logical only if this generalization works. So it borrows its logical strength from an inductive generalization.

The next passage, from Science News, provides a second example of borrowed logic in an argument from analogy.

The concept of “vintage year” took on a new meaning this week when two scientists presented the first chemical evidence that wine existed as far back as about 3500 bc. They had noticed a red stain while piecing together jars excavated from an Iranian site. They compared the stain with a similar stain in an ancient Egyptian vessel known to have contained wine. The researchers scraped the reddish residue from the jars and analyzed the samples with infrared spectroscopy. Residues from the Iranian and Egyptian jars looked alike and were full of tartaric acid, a chemical naturally abundant only in grapes. “Those crystals are a signature for wine,” says one researcher.

The argument can be clarified thus:

  • The Egyptian jar had a certain red stain and contained wine.
  • The Iranian jar had the same red stain.
  • ∴ That Iranian jar contained wine.

In this case, if the similarity is relevant it is because the background argument is a sound explanatory argument (of a sort we will cover thoroughly in the next chapter) that establishes that the red stains (the basic similarity) have properties that are best explained as caused by wine (the inferred similarity). This argument’s logical strength is borrowed from an explanatory argument.

As a final example, arguments from analogy can even borrow their logical strength from deductive arguments. Consider the validity counterexamples of Chapter 10. In that chapter we started with an inverted—and invalid—Socrates argument:

  • All men are mortal.
  • Socrates is mortal.
  • ∴ Socrates is a man.

We then offered as a validity counterexample this obviously invalid (because of true premises and false conclusion) Atlantic argument:

  • All ponds are bodies of water.
  • The Atlantic Ocean is a body of water.
  • ∴ The Atlantic Ocean is a pond.

In this way we saw that the Socrates argument was invalid. Like any validity counterexample, the reasoning can be represented as an argument from analogy, clarified as follows:

  • The Atlantic argument has a certain form and is invalid.
  • The Socrates argument has the same form.
  • ∴ The Socrates argument is invalid.

Here the relevance of the similarity depends on a deductive background argument; for the way to argue that a certain form (the basic similarity) is invalid (the inferred similarity) is by use of this valid affirming the antecedent argument, which has a self-evidently true first premise:

  • If the form of an argument is such that it is possible for the premises to be true and the conclusion false, then the argument is invalid.
  • This particular form is such that it is possible for the premises to be true and the conclusion false.
  • ∴ The argument is invalid.

In this case, the logical strength of the analogical argument is borrowed from a sound deduction.

By its very nature, then, when an analogical argument works it works on borrowed logic. The two analogs mainly serve to get in the way by providing a basis for relevant dissimilarities. It is the background argument, which ignores the analogs and is concerned solely with the basic and inferred similarities, that serves as the argument’s motor. In the end, the background argument cannot itself be some other argument from analogy, since the background argument would depend on a background argument (and so on).

There are two practical lessons here. First, if you can see what the background argument is, bring it to the foreground when you clarify the argument, abandoning the analogical form. The Toyota argument, for example, would be much easier to evaluate properly if clarified as a complex argument composed of an inductive generalization and a frequency argument (as illustrated in Chapter 14); and the Iranian jar argument, likewise, if paraphrased as an explanatory argument. Second, if you cannot see what the background argument is, you should normally resist the temptation to judge it as logically strong until you better understand the background argument. As noted at the beginning of the chapter, analogical arguments are custom-made for the way our minds work, which makes them extraordinarily persuasive. But their inherent reliance on logical borrowing also makes them very good at concealing logical defects. When a persuasive car salesman won’t let you open the hood to inspect the motor, it may be prudent to shop elsewhere.

15.4.2 Arguments from Analogy as Psychological Lenders

From a logical point of view, analogical arguments are borrowers. But from a psychological point of view, they often put other arguments deeply into their debt. They can hint as well as hide.

Look, for example, at the Iranian jar argument. The analogy between the two stains is what suggested to the researchers that the jar had once contained wine. This set in motion a research effort in which samples scraped from both jars were examined by infrared spectroscopy, revealing crystals that were “a signature for wine.” One could perhaps say that this new evidence converts the initial analogical argument from a merely suggestive one into a logically strong one, by showing just how relevant the basic similarity (same red stain) is to the inferred similarity (that it contained wine). But it would be much clearer to simply say that the background argument displaces the argument from analogy. Analogical reasoning has lent a powerful psychological boost to the research program by producing the suggestive idea. Still, any logical strength it gains from that research program is borrowed from the background argument—that is, from the explanatory argument about crystals developed by the researchers. Clarity is increased if the initial analogy drops out of any account of the logical support for the conclusion—as long as it remains as a central feature of the history of the discovery. [3]

Analogical arguments can lend a valuable psychological boost to inquiry of every sort. Consider the free speech argument. Even if you are not persuaded by the proposed analogy between shouting fire and distributing leaflets, it is certainly suggestive. In particular, it suggests that you are wrong if you think that all expressions are protected. Further, it suggests a way of reasoning about which ones are not protected—namely, by thinking about the possible dangers caused by the speech in question. If that way of reasoning succeeds, the argument from analogy gets psychological credit for suggesting it, even if it gets no logical credit for supporting it.

Nineteenth-century philosopher John Stuart Mill aptly declared that good reasoners will consider any analogical argument as a “guidepost, pointing out the direction in which more rigorous investigations should be prosecuted.” Arguments from analogy brilliantly serve a necessary function in reasoning. We would be lost without good guideposts. But we should not confuse them with destinations.

EXERCISES Chapter 15, set (d)

Fully clarify and evaluate each of the arguments from analogy. In cases where you can see the background argument, you may clarify and evaluate either the analogical argument or the background argument.

  • I’ve only seen one Hitchcock movie— Psycho. It was scary. Let’s try The Birds. I bet it will be scary too.
  • To solve our drug problems, instead of outlawing drugs we must make them as safe and risk-free and—yes—as healthy as possible. It’s like sex. We recognize that people will continue to have sex for nonreproductive reasons, whatever the laws, and with that in mind we try to make sexual practices as safe as possible in order to minimize the spread of the sexually transmitted diseases.
  • Question (investigator, to a university president): “Your administration will undertake reviews or investigations of members of your faculty without their being informed of the fact?”

A:  “I believe it’s very possible. I believe it happened in this case.”

Q:  “Do you consider that proper and appropriate?”

A:  “Personal opinion? Yes.”

Q: “Can you tell me why?”

A:  “I don’t know. Why not? I guess in an analogy, I don’t think J. Edgar Hoover, for example, ever advised everybody he was investigating that they were being investigated.”

Q:  “But he, J. Edgar Hoover, wasn’t running a university.”— Lingua Franca

  • Breceda and lifeguards up and down the beach stressed the dangers of sleeping on the beach at night. “The people who get hurt are pretty much innocent,” Breceda said. “They take a walk on the beach at Puerto Vallarta at 3 a.m. and nothing happens, and so they assume it’s OK to do it here. But a whole different situation occurs here.” In addition to the dangers posed by muggers and rapists, people sleeping on the beach also could get run over by sweepers. — Los Angeles Times (Consider the argument attributed to the people who sleep on the beach.)
  • “ Question: Surely society has a right to rid itself of a man like Ted Bundy? Answer : My main opposition to the death penalty is what it does to society. Our society kills people in cages. It is like going hunting in a zoo. In the cage they are not dangerous, but executing them is very dangerous—for us.” —I. Gray and M. Stanley, eds., A Punishment in Search of a Crime: Americans Speak Out Against the Death Penalty
  • “At their August 1945 Potsdam meeting, Truman remarked to an aide, ‘Stalin is as near like Tom Pendergast as any man I know.’ Pendergast was a Missouri machine boss who helped get Truman elected to the Senate. For some superficial reason Truman concluded that, like Pendergast, Stalin was a man one could deal with, a man of his word. ‘It led Truman to believe that Stalin would hold free elections in Eastern Europe,’ says Deborah Larson, a UCLA political scientist.” — Associated Press
  • Gerry Spence is serving as the pro bono defense attorney for an “environmental terrorist” who embedded metal plates in trees so that the bulldozers would be wrecked (and, potentially, the drivers injured). He is asked if “monkeywrenching” trees is ever justified. Spence’s sleight-of-hand answer reveals why he wins so many cases: “In most circumstances, breaking the law is improper. Now, suppose a tractor is about to run over a child. Is it improper to demolish the tractor? Suppose the tractor was going to run over something inanimate, a painting by Van Gogh that cost $32 million. Now, what about a tractor running down a tree? A 400-year-old original growth tree?” — Forbes
  • “Thoughtful and right-minded men place their homage and consideration for woman upon an instinctive consciousness that her unmasculine qualities, whether called weaknesses, frailties, or what we will, are the sources of her characteristic and a special strength within the area of her legitimate endeavor. In actual war, it is the men who go to battle, enduring hardship and privation and suffering disease and death for the cause they follow. It is the mothers, wives, and maids betrothed, who neither following the camp nor fighting in battle, constitute at home an army of woman’s constancy and love whose yearning hearts make men brave and patriotic. So, in political warfare, it is perfectly fitting that actual strife and battle would be apportioned to men, and that the influence of woman, radiating from the homes of our land, should inspire to lofty aims and purposes those who struggle for the right.” —Grover Cleveland, Ladies Home Journal, 1905
  • One philosopher, arguing that the rights of a rape victim to make decisions about her body can be more important than the right to life of a fetus, develops the following analogy: “Let me ask you to imagine this. You wake up in the morning and find yourself back to back in bed with an unconscious violinist. A famous unconscious violinist. He has been found to have a fatal kidney ailment, and the Society of Music Lovers has canvassed all the available medical records and found that you alone have the right blood type to help. They have therefore kidnapped you, and last night the violinist’s circulatory system was plugged into yours, so that your kidneys can be used to extract poisons from his blood as well as your own. The director of the hospital now tells you, ‘Look, we’re sorry the Society of Music Lovers did this to you—we would never have permitted it if we had known. But still, they did it, and the violinist now is plugged into you. To unplug you would be to kill him. But never mind, it’s only for nine months. By then he will have recovered from his ailment, and can safely be unplugged from you.’ Is it morally incumbent on you to accede to this situation?” —Judith Jarvis Thompson, Philosophy and Public Affairs
  • “Look round the world. Contemplate the whole and every part of it. You will find it to be like one great machine, subdivided into an infinite number of lesser machines, which again admit of subdivisions to a degree beyond what human senses and faculties can trace and explain. All these various machines and their parts are adjusted to each other with an accuracy which ravishes into admiration all men who have ever contemplated them. From this we can see that the curious adapting of means to ends throughout all nature resembles exactly, though it much exceeds, the adapting of means to ends in the things made by human beings. Since, therefore, the effects resemble each other, we are led to infer, by all the rules of analogy, that the causes also resemble, and that there is an Author of Nature who is somewhat similar to the mind of man, though possessed of much larger faculties, proportioned to the grandeur of the work which he has executed. Therefore we prove at once the existence of God and his similarity to human mind and intelligence.” —David Hume, Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion

15.5 Summary of Chapter Fifteen

Arguments from analogy typically contend that because two items are the same in one respect, they are the same in another respect. The basic analog is compared to the inferred analog; because they have the basic similarity in common, it is concluded that the inferred analog also has the inferred similarity.

The total evidence condition has two parts. First, the basic similarity must be relevant—that is, it must count toward the presence of the inferred similarity. Second, there must not be any dissimilarities that are relevant—that is, any dissimilarity between the two analogs must not make the basic analog a better candidate for the inferred property. The argument is logically weaker to the extent that it fails in either of these two areas.

Their only positive logical strength comes from the background argument that establishes that the inferred similarity follows from the basic similarity; thus, whatever logical success analogical arguments have is borrowed. This makes it especially important to pay close attention to the first part of the total evidence condition. On the other hand, analogical arguments play an important psychological role in suggesting lines of reasoning, and so should be cultivated for that purpose.

15.6 Guidelines for Chapter Fifteen

  • Structure arguments from analogy, when it would be loyal to do so, by identifying four things—the basic and inferred analogs and the basic and inferred similarities—then inserting each into its proper place in the form. Remember that the second premise, which declares the basic similarity, is often implicit.
  • In considering whether an argument from analogy has satisfied the total evidence condition, first ask, Is the basic similarity relevant? To answer this question, look at the extent to which the basic similarity counts in favor of the inferred similarity.
  • When the basic similarity is described by a general term, consider whether its meaning shifts from one use to the next. If it shifts enough to affect the soundness of the argument, revise your clarification to eliminate the ambiguity.
  • In considering whether an argument from analogy has satisfied the total evidence condition, ask next, Are any of the dissimilarities relevant? To answer this question, look at the extent to which any dissimilarity makes the basic analog a better candidate than the inferred analog for the inferred property.
  • When you can clearly see the background argument, clarify it rather than the argument from analogy. When you cannot see the background argument, you should normally reserve final judgment about the strength of the argument’s logic.

15.7 Glossary for Chapter Fifteen

Analogs —the two things (or classes of things) that are said to be similar in an argument from analogy.

Argument from analogy —an argument that asserts that because two items are the same in one respect, they are the same in another respect. They can be represented by this form:

Background argument —an argument that shows that the inferred similarity (of an analogical argument) follows from the basic similarity—that is, an argument that shows that the basic similarity is relevant.

Basic analog —in an argument from analogy, the item that we are presumably more familiar with, which is presumably known to have both the basic and the inferred similarities.

Basic similarity —in an argument from analogy, the property that the two analogs share, presumably without controversy.

Fallacy of false analogy —the mistake of using an argument from analogy in which the basic similarity is not relevant or in which there are relevant dissimilarities between the basic and inferred analogs. Because this term says nothing about what precisely has gone wrong with the argument, it is better to explain more specifically how it is that some necessary condition for soundness has not been satisfied. Also called the fallacy of faulty analogy.

Inferred analog —in an argument from analogy, the item in question, about which the argument is drawing its conclusion.

Inferred similarity —in an argument from analogy, the property that the inferred analog is alleged to have because the basic analog has it.

  • The British usually spell it analogue . Historically, the term was analogon . ↵
  • The second part of the total evidence condition for frequency arguments operates the same way. ↵
  • To use terminology mentioned elsewhere in the text, it is important in the context of discovery, but not in the context of justification. ↵

An argument that asserts that because two items are the same in one respect, they are the same in another respect. They can be represented by this form:

1. A is F and G. 2. B is F. ∴ C . B is G.

The two things (or classes of things) that are said to be similar in an argument from analogy.

In an argument from analogy, the item that we are presumably more familiar with, which is presumably known to have both the basic and the inferred similarities.

In an argument from analogy, the item in question, about which the argument is drawing its conclusion.

In an argument from analogy, the property that the two analogs share, presumably without controversy.

In an argument from analogy, the property that the inferred analog is alleged to have because the basic analog has it.

The mistake of using an argument from analogy in which the basic similarity is not relevant or in which there are relevant dissimilarities between the basic and inferred analogs. Because this term says nothing about what precisely has gone wrong with the argument, it is better to explain more specifically how it is that some necessary condition for soundness has not been satisfied. Also called the fallacy of faulty analogy.

An argument that shows that the inferred similarity (of an analogical argument) follows from the basic similarity—that is, an argument that shows that the basic similarity is relevant.

A Guide to Good Reasoning: Cultivating Intellectual Virtues Copyright © 2020 by David Carl Wilson is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License , except where otherwise noted.

Share This Book


  1. Analogy Essay- Hints and Tips etc

    analogy argumentative essay topics

  2. Analogies essay

    analogy argumentative essay topics

  3. 21 Actual Analogies Used By Students in English Essays

    analogy argumentative essay topics

  4. PPT

    analogy argumentative essay topics

  5. 10+ Analogy Essay Examples Most Popular

    analogy argumentative essay topics

  6. Argument from analogy

    analogy argumentative essay topics


  1. Argumentative ESSAY part I

  2. Argumentative Essay (writing for academic pusposes)

  3. Writing.Argumentative essay (MendaDondo321422053)

  4. How to Write an Argumentative Essay?

  5. 5th Generation Warfare (CSS Argumentative Essay)

  6. Fallacies: Non-Sequitur, Faulty Analogy, Hasty Generalization


  1. How Do You Write an Argumentative Essay?

    To write an argumentative essay, write an opening paragraph that introduces the topic, craft a thesis statement that details the position or side of the argument defended in the body, and provide supporting arguments throughout the body of ...

  2. What Are Examples of Analogical Reasoning?

    One example of analogical reasoning is as follows: since the world is similar to a clock in the respect that it has complexity and a clock has a maker, the world must also have a maker. Arguments from analogy are inductive arguments.

  3. What Is a Central Argument?

    A central argument is the cornerstone of any good paper. It is either what the writer wants to persuade the readers to think or the purpose of the essay. It can be summed up in one or two sentences, and should always be concise and straight...

  4. Writing Topics for an Essay Developed With Analogies

    Thirty Topic Suggestions: Analogy · Working at a fast-food restaurant · Moving to a new neighborhood · Starting a new job · Quitting a job · Watching

  5. Analogy Essays: Examples, Topics, Titles, & Outlines

    Can we afford this type of intervention? In my opinion, we cannot and the argumentation against such a legislative… ☆Recommended Essay. Paperdue

  6. How To Write An Analogy Essay

    How To Write An Analogy Essay · 2. Draw a vertical line down the middle of a piece of paper to divide it in half · 3. Write a paragraph discussing

  7. Analogy

    25 Examples of Analogies · life is like a race · needle in a haystack · pen is the weapon of a writer · deck chairs on the titanic · detective investigates crimes

  8. Analogy Essay Examples

    How true is this in the presence of the fact that the billions of barrels of crude oil many OPEC countries claim to have? If indeed the world's oil reserve is


    resemblances between 2 unconnected ideas. • You used analogy as an argumentative tool. • Your argument is more than the fact that these 2 subjects share traits.

  10. Metaphors and Analogies: How to Use Them in Your Academic Life

    Essay Topics & IdeasArgumentative Essay TopicsCause and Effect Essay ... analogies, which can improve the reader's understanding of complex topics

  11. Argument From Analogy Essay

    The argument from analogy is an inductive argument that focuses on the problem of other minds and aims to show that we are justified in inferring the


    Many issues have been plaguing the sports world recently, especially the question of paying college athletes. Are athletics so important that colleges need to

  13. Analogy Essay Topics

    Analogy Essay Topics · 1. Homeostasis: An Analogy Homeostasis – An Analogy The human body is everything that makes up, well, you. · 2. Paley's

  14. Chapter Fifteen: Arguments from Analogy

    Suppose I say, “Einstein was smart, and he was able to revolutionize physics. The physics teacher I had in high school is smart, too, so he should be able to